It looks like AMD will soon be joining Intel in offering hybrid processor designs with more than one type of CPU core. According to , images rummy best of a smaller variant of AMD's excellent Phoenix rummy golds APU, as seen in laptops and also handhelds like the , have emerged. The scuttlebutt is that this new "Phoenix 2" chip packs multiple CPU core designs.
Said to be significantly smaller than the existing Phoenix APU at 137mm2, down from 178mm2, Phoenix 2 reportedly drops from 12 graphics CUs to just 4 CUs. That's a pity in terms of gaming performance, but it's the CPU side of the chip where things get interesting.
Those Zen 4c cores are supposed to be smaller and more efficient than full Zen 4 cores. But , AMD is taking a different approach to Intel with its efficient cores.
Intel's Efficient cores as seen in its Alder Lake and are dramatically smaller than its full Performance cores. Roughly, four Intel Efficient cores can be squeezed into the rummy mars same die space as one Performance core. In short, Intel's Efficient cores are based on a very different architecture. Most obviously, they lack Hyper-Threading and can only process a single thread per core.
By contrast, AMD's Zen 4c cores are about half the size of a full Zen 4 core. In other words, two Zen 4c cores fit in the same die space as a Zen 4 core. Functionally and architecturally, Zen 4c is essentially the same
as Zen 4. It has exactly the same front-end, scheduler, execution stage and instruction issue width, the same L1 and L2 cache, the works.
Oh, and includes supporting two threads per core, unlike Intel's Efficient cores, which are single threaded. The difference comes in two areas. Zen 4c's transistor layout and the L3 cache has been cut in half to 2MB per core. Remarkably, that's enough to squeeze two Zen 4c cores into the space of one Zen 4 core.
: Our verdict on Valve's handheld PC.
: Get decked out
: How to get one.
: What's the real battery life of the new device?
: Using Valve's handheld hardware as the ultimate emulator.
For the most part, then, Zen 4c should deliver the same performance per clock as Zen 4. It'll only be scenarios where the L3 cache is being hit hard that Zen 4 will have an advantage. Of course, games are just one such application , which is why AMD's own X3D CPUs with added cache memory such as the exist.
As for clock speed, the rumours suggest the hit isn't particularly hefty, with the maximum CPU clock dropping from 5.1GHz for Phoenix to 4.9GHz for Phoenix 2. However, it's not clear if that 4.9GHz applies to both core types or perhaps just the full Zen 4 cores.
What's more, it's equally not clear what approach AMD will take with its desktop CPUs when it comes to hybrid core designs. AMD's upcoming Zen 5 CPUs, expected to launch in 2024, were rumoured to make the jump to hybrid cores. However, the latest rumblings indicate Zen 5 will in fact once again contain up to 16 cores based in a single full-performance architecture.
However, given AMD's approach with Zen 4c and the fact that it did a similar thing with slightly cut-down Zen 2 cores in its ultra-low-power 7020 series Mendocino processors, as and when AMD does go hybrid on the desktop, we'd expect its efficiency cores to be rather closer in design and performance to its full fat cores than Intel's. Watch this space.